Tuesday, October 5, 2010

How Adjustable Are You?

When designing a belt drive, one important feature you always need to keep in the back of your mind is how you will be applying tension to the belt. If you have two fixed shafts, you will need an idler assembly. If your center distance is adjustable, you will need to know how much adjustment you have. Fixed center distance without adjustment or idlers have worked in the past, but success stories are rare and this type of belt drive set-up is not recommended.

Anytime a Gates Engineer designs a belt drive for you, you will get a theoretical center distance and also an install/take-up range. What do these mean you ask?

  • An installation distance is the center distance we recommend your shafts be able to achieve in order for proper installation without issues. If you don't have the available installation distance for your belt during the installation process than your belt will seem like it's too short for the center distance you measured. This can lead to forcing the belt onto the pulleys which can be damaging for the belt and pulleys.
  • A take up distance is the center distance we recommend your shafts be able to achieve in order to maintain proper tension on the belt throughout the life of the belt. If you don't have the available take up distance then your belt can become loose which can lead to premature failures.

Each belt line has a different installation and take-up range because they all have different length and stretching properties. If you don't know what your belts installation and take-up range is than you can use one of Gate's drive design programs (DesignFlex or Design IQ) to calculate it, or you can calculate it yourself by looking up the equations in the appropriate Gates Drive Design Manual. Gate's drive design programs and drive design manuals are available on the website at www.gates.com/drivedesign.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Measure Twice, Cut Once

True, the old adage "measure twice, cut once" applies directly to carpentry and not to belt drive design, but there is some truth in the saying that designers should pay attention to.

When designing a replacement or retrofit synchronous belt drive for a piece of equipment currently using a V-belt drive, it is recommended that the actual operating shaft speeds be measured instead of just basing the new synchronous belt drive design on the existing V-belt sheave diameters.

Why?

Glad you asked!

V-belts will slip, from little (well maintained) to a fair amount (if poorly maintained, or running in worn sheave grooves).   It is very easy to make significant errors in the driveN shaft design speed if you assume that the V-belt drive is operating at exactly the ratio as calculated by the sheave diameter ratio.  Good practice is to always measure the shaft speeds - with either a contact or strobe tachometer.

This is of extra importance when designing a drive to operate on fans or centrifugal pumps - where the driveN load characteristic is sensitive to operating speed.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

High Speed - Small Pitch Drive Applications

Synchronous belt drives are often used in high speed applications even though V-belt drives are typically better suited. They are often used because of their positive driving characteristic (no creep or slip), and because they require minimal maintenance (minimal stretch). A significant drawback of high speed synchronous drives is drive noise. High speed synchronous drives will nearly always produce more noise than V-belt drives. Small pitch synchronous drives operating at speeds in excess of 1300 ft/min (6.6 m/s) are considered to be high speed.

Special considerations should be given to high speed drive designs, as a number of factors can significantly influence belt performance. Cord fatigue and belt tooth wear are the two most significant factors that must be controlled to ensure success. Moderate sprocket diameters should be used to reduce the rate of cord flex fatigue. Designing with a smaller pitch belt will often provide better cord flex fatigue characteristics than a larger pitch belt. PowerGrip GT2 is especially well suited for high speed drives because of its excellent belt tooth entry/exit characteristics. Smooth interaction between the belt tooth and sprocket groove minimizes wear and noise. Belt installation tension is especially critical with high speed drives. Low belt tension allows the belt to ride out of the driven sprocket resulting in rapid belt tooth and sprocket groove wear.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Gates Can Help You Select the Perfect Belt for Your Application

Do you want help designing a belt drive for your application?

Are you wondering which Gates belt will work best for your application?

Do you have technical belt questions that you can't find answers for?

Gates belt application engineers are here to help you!

Gates application engineers are available to assist you Monday through Friday, 7:00-11:00 am and 12:00 pm-4:00 pm MST.

You can talk to a Gates application engineer by calling 303-744-5800, option 2. Application engineers may also be contacted via email at ptpasupport@gates.com.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Understanding Power: Power Factor, Apparent/Reactive/Real Power

In order to understand energy and the efficiency gains made possible by synchronous belt drives, it is important that four terms be explained and their relationship to each other defined. Those four terms are apparent power, reactive power, real power, and power factor.


Apparent power is the total power supplied by the utility company to the end user’s facility. Apparent power is measured in kiloVolt Amperes (kVA). This power is comprised of 2 components - reactive power and real power.

Reactive power is measured in kilovolt Amperes Reactive (kVAR). For power transmission purposes, we are dealing primarily with electric motors. Reactive power is the non-working power necessary to create the magnetic field in an electric motor. Some facilities utilize capacitors in their electrical system to reduce the amount of reactive power required. Depending on the size of the end user, his power demands, and the limitations of the local utility company, capacitance correction can be “encouraged” by the utility company. This “encouragement” typically takes the form of a penalty if the utility company feels that the facility is requiring too much reactive power (and total apparent power as a result). Remember that since it is not included in their billing, reactive power is of no interest to the end user. Only the utility company is concerned with reactive power. Since reactive power is part of the power supplied by the utility company, it must also be accounted for in the utility company’s power generation capacity. By forcing users to control reactive power, utility companies can stretch their resources.

Real power is the power paid for by the end user, and is measured in kiloWatts (kW). Real power is also the power that can be reduced by converting V-belt drives to synchronous belt drives and utilizing the mechanical efficiency advantages of a positive drive. Real power is the component of the power supplied by the utility company that actually does useful work. Utility customers are actually billed for kiloWatt-Hour
(kW-Hr) usage, a typical energy value.

Power factor is simply the ratio of real power to apparent power. Utility companies prefer high power factors (over .90) since that results in a lower reactive power and thus a lower total apparent power that they must supply. However, this tends to run opposite of the effects of energy saving devices at the output of electrical motors. Anytime load is reduced on the motor (by increasing the efficiency of the power transmission system, or increasing the driveN equipment efficiency), the power factor will drop. In order for electric motors to operate at a high power factor, they must be loaded to their full capacity. Motors operating at loads less than 100% will see corresponding drops in power factors.

The real power being used for work and paid for by the end user is basically calculated by multiplying the power factor, voltage (volts), and current (amperes) together. In order to reduce the real power (kW) being consumed, the end user must therefore reduce either the power factor, the voltage, or the current (or any combination of the three). Energy savings measurements performed using a computer data logger system have shown that conversions to synchronous belt drives from V-belt drives rarely result in a voltage reduction. Small savings in amperage have been noted, but are typically small enough to be undetectable by ordinary clamp-on ammeters. The primary savings in real power (kW) usage is in power factor reduction. This has been demonstrated on every successful conversion that has been measured, and is an expected occurrence. The characteristics of electric motors demands that the power factor decline as the power demands decline.

The final result is that when looking at the bottom line - energy being paid for by the end user (kW-Hrs) - synchronous belt drives do result in energy savings. Field testing has proven that the 5% energy savings claim is valid, and in many cases conservative. For a thorough energy savings evaluation, it is necessary to use equipment which measures all of the components of energy usage: time, current, voltage, and power factor. Without measuring all of the components, an incomplete picture of the energy usage is provided. Common hand held instruments (ammeter, voltmeter) are insufficient by themselves to document energy savings. If an installation must be surveyed for energy usage, equipment which has the ability to measure all four components of energy usage (such as a data logger) must be used.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Gates Engineering Website

If you are looking for a place where you can find technical information regarding Gate's industrial belt drive products, try logging on to www.gates.com/drivedesign. Here you can find all of the industrial power transmission resources consolodated into one location. Content on this site includes:


  • Case Studies

  • Drive Design Programs

  • Catalogs

  • Drive Design Manuals

  • Installation Tools

  • Gates Facts

  • White Papers & Notes

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Torpedalo Project

Ever think about crossing the Atlantic Ocean in a human powered craft? This is exactly what Mark Byass and Mike Sayer in the UK are planning to do for charity in a special pedal powered boat that they are designing. As engineers, they are designing the boat to be entirely self-sufficient with onboard electricity generation and water production. The planned duration for the 3000 mile journey is only 38 days. Mark and Mike will be rotating 12 hour shifts on the pedals, and their power will hopefully be transmitted to the propeller and on board support equipment via. belt drive systems. Preliminary belt drive designs are currently being reviewed and refined, and one will likely incorporate an unusual 90 degree twist. Belt drive systems are efficient, reliable, and quiet making them an ideal choice for this unique and demanding application. Read more about this exciting project at www.torpedalo.com.

Search This Blog